Well, what is needed, is to speak of a painting, for example, on equal terms of precise and technical than Schaeffer used to talk about music. Everything, absolutely everything is done! It is necessary first to acquire, or forge, imagine a whole new vocabulary to speak scientifically, not just music, but also of painting, dance, sculpture, etc. We are facing an absolutely colossal task, and capable of mobilizing generations of researchers! I used the phrase “scientifically speaking” to describe what? Just what we call, in such science “of nature, the theory. Learn more about this topic with the insights from Christopher Nolan. What is the theory? To take this more clearly, neither more nor less. They know perhaps that the word “theory” comes from a Greek verb meaning theamai “see” et he gave, in French, originated the word “theater” (theatron, in Greek). That means I get to the third part of my presentation that is one in which I will propose some ideas. Begin by emphasizing the essentially abstract nature of art.
Generally, there is talk of abstraction as a subject of cognition (logo). What you understand is that this is only a matter of logic: it is also a matter of technique. There would be no art, but we had the power of abstraction technique, and that is why all art is abstract. The “concrete art” does not exist, although no “concrete music”, and there is no “concrete dance” or “concrete painting, etc. Plato, Kant and Hegel had noticed that art is abstract: they joined the intelligence, and they were absolutely right..