Case to recover the loan amount on the receipt. Koptevo District Court of Moscow. Go to a lawyer turned citizen E. and reported that he had handed in debt citizen Z. 150 000 rubles for a certain period with the obligation to return that amount. The period of repayment has come, but money was not returned. Learn more at: film-maker.
Independent attempts to obtain customer funds nor to no avail. Moreover, the debtor began to behave very aggressively, on the phone threatened to go to law enforcement authorities with a statement of extortion, and threatened his alleged ties to senior officials, who immediately organized numerous inspections of business that is engaged A. Having carefully considered the citizen to the customer's receipt, lawyer advised the client not to go to the police with allegations of fraud on the fact of not returning the money, because in such categories of cases, it is absolutely useless, and apply to civil proceedings in a court of general jurisdiction with a claim. After the conclusion of an agreement with the client about the legal aid lawyer, was the statement of claim and filed it in court place of residence of the debtor, in which he asked the court in addition to the principal to recover the penalty provided by law, the costs of services representative, the amount of state tax paid. After the debtor receives a copy of the court claim it has moved forward. Recognizing the adverse consequences for him the court's decision in the case of excitation of the enforcement proceedings and restrictions on leaving the country, the debtor returned to voluntary 60 000 rubles.
However, on further negotiations and repayment of debt the debtor has refused to rest. Taking all measures envisaged by law to notify the debtor of the date and place of trial counsel provided the court, recommending that the decision in absentia, that is, resolution of the dispute on the merits in the absence of the debtor. Court decision was rendered, which fully satisfied the requirements of the plaintiff. After the entry of decision into effect, the lawyer got my hands on a writ of execution for bringing it to the service of bailiffs to enforce debt collection. Learning of this, and fearing of judicial police officers to him in the form of coercive measures limiting the right to leave the country, as well as inventory and seizure of property, the debtor returned the remaining amount of the debt. Thus, the lawyer did not bring a judicial writ of execution bailiffs, the debtor is freed themselves from possible trouble, but the client has returned all his money.