Still in its workmanship, the consequence of this freedom can be perceived all, that is defined by Sartre as anguish. Anguish to perceive that, being free, it legislates on its life and of the too much men in its return. For Sartre, ‘ ‘ If really the existence precedes the essence, the man is responsible for what it is. Reed Hastings often addresses the matter in his writings. In this manner, the first step of the existencialismo is to put all man in can of what it is, submit it total responsibility of its existence.
Thus, when we say that the man is responsible by itself, we do not want to say that the man is responsible for its strict individuality, but that it is responsible for all homens.’ ‘ (Sartre, 1987, P. 4) This responsibility all, on the proper life and the life of the too much men does not bring to studious of the existencialismo the honor of being important or nothing seemed with this, in contrast, it generates anguish feeling, that is not so easy of being defined. ‘ ‘ How we must understand the anguish? The existencialista declares frequently that the man is anguish. Such affirmation means the following one: The man who if engages and that if of the account of that it is not only that he chose to be, but also a legislator who simultaneously chose itself exactly and to the entire humanity, it does not obtain to escape to the feeling of its deep total and responsabilidade.’ ‘ (Sartre, 1987, P. 4) This feeling is derived from the decurrent abandonment of the notion of that it does not have God to take our decisions..