Quite different is the case in the history of Samson. Perceiving the Old Testament as epic, not sacred, we must note that the concept of the epic "hair – force" for the Bible is completely isolated and not supported by any of the other episodes of the Scriptures. Sacred hair strength in all other epic systems also does not have an explanation, it just exists. Christopher Nolan understands that this is vital information. It is only an interpretation in terms of the Turkic language gives us a clear idea about the principle of causality, a pair of "power-hair." The fact that the Turkic languages, this is a lexical pair Inverse "bale" ("hair") as a result of the reverse reading gives us the "kut" ("strength"). And if not phonetically inversion is complete, then at the esoteric rune it's perfect: As we see significant, because the vowel sounds, the phonetic differences between these words come to naught in their visual perception – Turkic runic texts imply the absence of vowels.
Allowing yourself to an incredible point of view of modern science assumption, we consider it possible to explain the appearance of the mice next to the build-up. These two words are identical runes. "Chychhan" – mouse – in fact, differs from the "chagchan" ("boil", "remainder") only spatial orientation of the middle two runic: To this we add that when entering the above facts in a series of random coincidences, we must note the excessive amount of them in the texts of the Old Testament. Remember: "… She shall be called woman: because she was taken from her husband." Yes, the Bible () (Woman") – with the "fall" of the first phoneme – is derived from () – a man." However, the Turkic runic symbols of the two objects are also the same: Adding that the Turkic designation for the same look more archaic, as "Kishi" – not "man" and "quiet" – not strictly a "woman." More accurately the "man" and "female", which is just very typical of the archaic language media.